Monthly Archives: December 2011

Hearing Impairment Does Not Per Se Preclude Individual As A Juror: Trial Court Has Discretion And If Possible Reasonable Accommodation Should Be Made

People v. Guay 2011 NY Slip Op 08178 Decided November 15, 2011 New York Court of Appeals.    Issue: Whether Supreme Court abused its discretion when it dismissed a hearing-impaired prospective juror for cause. Holding: We hold that it did not. Trial courts … Continue reading

Posted in Voir Dire: Jury Selection | Leave a comment

Court Must Advise Of Post Release Supervision Or Reversal Is Warranted

People v. McAlpin  2011 Slip Op 08456 Decided November 22, 2011 New York Court of Appeals  Issue: Whether the trial court’s failure to mention the potential imposition of post-release supervision at sentencing required reversal and vacatur of the plea. Holding: Where … Continue reading

Posted in Post-Release Supervision, Sentence | Leave a comment

The Molineux Rule And The Scope Of Expert Witness Testimony

People v. Rivers 2011 NY Slip Op 08455  Decided November 22, 2011 New York Court of Appeals  See also Eyewitness Identification Expert: When Is Expert Testimony Admissible Issue(s): 1) Whether repeated violations of the trial court’s Molineux ruling was so prejudicial … Continue reading

Posted in Evidence, Expert Testimony, Harmless Error, Molineux Evidence | Leave a comment

Due Process/Harmless Error: Shackles On The Defendant At Trial.

People v. Clyde 2011 NY Slip Op 08453 Decided November 22, 2011 New York Court of Appeals  Issue: whether the presence of shackles on the defendant during trial violated his constitutional rights and whether it so prejudiced the defendant that … Continue reading

Posted in Due Process, Harmless Error, Trial Procedures | Leave a comment

Can A Defendant Be Forced To Wear Shackles During A Trial?

People v. Cruz 2011 NY Slip Op 08454 Decided November 22, 2011 New York Court of Appeals  Issue: whether the presence of leg shackles on the defendant during trial was a violation of his constitutional rights and so highly prejudicial that … Continue reading

Posted in Trial Procedures | Tagged | Leave a comment